Nov
4
Hey, so remember that book I wrote? No, not that book. This book. Now I know what you’re thinking. “Craig, you didn’t write that book! Meg and Rachel did!” First off, it’s amazing how you think with hyperlinks. Secondly, may I remind you that my happy thing made the cover so of course I can take credit for every aspect of the book! Duh! Anyway, the book is out now. Enrico even found a copy of it out in the wild and sent me a pic:
See my quote and name! I’m super famous now! Shut up, yes I am! What does this have to do with the title of this post and my birthday gift you ask? Well, for my birthday (this coming Sunday, thank you very much) I want you to click here and order a copy and keep it and love it. This is a present for me in two ways. First way, it was written by my friends so you buying it would make me really happy. See, the happy book is working already! And second, if you use that link, I’ll get referral fees, so that’s another birthday present for me! While you’re at it, order all your Christmas shopping through Amazon links from my blog and get me lots of referral fees! But really, the book is amazing and is guaranteed to fill you with happy! Since I’m an ineloquent bastard, I’ll let the book tell you what it’s about:
The Happy Book shows how to practice and celebrate happiness so you can find it when you really need it. Packed with creative prompts, wacky ideas, and hip activities, this is the ultimate pick-me-up. Packaged to encourage doodling and drawing, The Happy Book has space to scribble thoughts, make lists, fill in the blanks, and paste pictures. This book is about creating a record of what makes you glad, whether that means ’80s hair bands or hot chocolate with churros.
Fully interactive and customizable for each reader, The Happy Book allows today’s social networking fans an offline outlet for play. From photo scavenger hunts to cake baking to finger painting, everyone’s happy formula is unique. The Happy Book enables readers to celebrate and share whatever gives them wall-to-wall joy.
See? Doesn’t that sound like fun?! I’m pretty sure you need it right away and one for each of your friends and relatives for the holidays. Order it now!
November 4th, 2009 at 9:53 am
I see you’re so famous that you don’t need a last name anymore.
November 4th, 2009 at 10:16 am
“guaranteed to fill you with happy”. Sry Craig, only my boyfriend is allowed to do that.
November 4th, 2009 at 10:45 am
Ordered!
I need a little happy in my life right now. 
November 4th, 2009 at 11:11 am
Hmm, my birthday is the 9th.
If you get a chance, watch the NSFW link below. Its from Mike Rose, the creator of Planet Unicorn. Its pretty darn funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh8KG_SjlE4
November 4th, 2009 at 11:34 am
I think I might be too old for “hip activities”. I believe there’s a shelf-life to being hip and I’m past it. Sigh.
You are so naughty DfrB. But it made me laugh.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:10 pm
Tam: You are certainly not too old for hip activities.
Besides, haven’t old people just gotten their’s replaced?
ZING!
November 4th, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Craig’s hip activities are guaranteed to fill you with happy.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
How did this post get so dirty all of a sudden? Or is it just me? It’s probably just me.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Tam: It was dirty from post #2.
Now, we need more comments so that we can find more innuendos.
How many posts before Polt can show up?
November 4th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
such a disguised way to promote your birthday Craiger….
November 4th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Cupcake, I’d say there will be about 10 comments before Polt shows up.
HUGS…
November 4th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
A book? You want me to buy a book for me for your birthday?
well….guess that means I’m returning the argyle thong, argyle dildo and argyle flavored lube….
HUGS…
November 4th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
And Tam I’m surpised it took until the second comment to get dirty. I mean, this IS Puntabulous, for Christs sake.
HUGS…
November 4th, 2009 at 4:10 pm
I’m sorry, Polt. I’ll be sure to make my first comment dirtier, next time.
November 4th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Well, I for one am shocked and apalled by
the lack of moredirty comments. You are all pervertsand that is why I <3 you.Oh, and BTW, what exactly does argyle taste like?
November 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
You’d have to ask Craiggers, but I imagine argyle tastes like Ireland.
HUGS…
November 4th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
So the argyle lube is just a bottle of Bailey’s? (I was going to suggest Jameson, but that seemed painful.)
November 4th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Not only did I find this in the wild, but I found it in the DISPLAY WINDOW of a Barnes & Noble in New York! You’re super famous actually!
November 5th, 2009 at 2:27 am
Ordered as per your command, my superfamous monkey overlord.
November 5th, 2009 at 7:05 am
Mmmmm, Baileys. I’ll take it even without the sex.
Thanks for ordering guys!
Just as an FYI: You don’t need to order the actual thing I’m linking to to get me referral fees. Just as long as you use a link of mine as a portal into amazon, you can click around and buy whatever you want. I still get money! (I originally wrote monkey) Someone bought a computer monitor the other day and got me $16! Yayz!
November 5th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Apparently, Gossip Girl is going to have a threesome next week. Which three do you think will be in it? Which three do you wish were in it?
November 5th, 2009 at 10:53 am
I think it’ll be Chuck, Blair, and Vanessa. (It’s definitely gotta be Chuck and Blair, but I’m not convinced the 3rd will be a main character.)
But wouldn’t Chuck, Dan, and Nate be grand? I’d even settle for Eric, Jonathan, and Jenny.
November 5th, 2009 at 11:24 am
I would love to see Chuck, Dan, and Nate. I just can’t write that plot into the space of one episode.
I think Blair, Chuck, and Nate would be interesting. Nate would be an obvious choice one of the guys that Chuck has kissed in the past.
My guess based on the way TV works is that it will be 1 boy + 2 girls. The show has trouble letting Eric and Jonathan show affection.
November 5th, 2009 at 11:38 am
Odd that in a show which has a target audience of girls and gay guys, we’d get a straight man’s fantasy for sweeps.
November 5th, 2009 at 11:47 am
I have never watched the show, but I’m telling ya, if the threesome’s gonna be the guy in the middle on the top row, the guy in the middle in the second row, and the guy on the left in the second row, then HEY, I’m there!
Aw, who am i kidding…ANY three of the guys together and I’d be there. Any two of the guys acutally kissing, single full frontal nudity, a group of them shown in bed shirtless but under the covers…I’m not too picky.
Nonetheless, I’m pretty sure considering this is an American TV show, my interest will remain unpiqued.
HUGS….
November 5th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
They BETTER play “3″ during that scene!!
November 5th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Network TV? Now way in hell will they do an m/m/f. MAYBE m/f/m but I’m thinking f/m/f. Hope that made sense. Faster to type it that way. HBO? m/m/m all the way. LOL
November 5th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Polt: Full frontal nudity is definitely not going to happen. It’s broadcast TV.
November 5th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Tam: They did either a m/f/m or m/m/f on Glee.
November 5th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
Now I want Mark Salling to guest star on next week’s Gossip Girl and take part in the threesome.
November 5th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Ryan: Did I miss that? How did I miss that? It must have been quickly in passing.
November 5th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Tam: In the episode with Kristen Chenoweth, her character, Puck, and Matt (football/glee club member) come out of the locker room shower together with very satisfied looks on their faces.
November 5th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Ryan: Oh yeah. Well if it was m/m/f there might be hope for a Puck/Curt pairing yet. LOL