Okay, I admit it. I think porn ads are fascinating. It’s amazing what they show and say in order to entice you to click on them. Today I have taken some of my favorites, cropped out all the naughty bits, leaving only the words. Then I added what I can only assume to be what’s waiting on the other side of those ads.
Too bad I never look at porn, so we’ll never know if my predictions were correct.
Enrico/Chris D./john –
I thought the same thing when I first saw the “hung” panel. But the porn ad said “hung” not “hanged” so Craig is off the hook on this one.
Grammar police make CraigHulk go SMAAAASH!!!
Does the CraigHulk look anything like the Craig-Frankenstein’s Monster? Because Craig-Frankenstein’s Monster was kinda hot.
Chris –
http://mmckee.net/pictures/craighulk.jpg
Craig looks good in green.
Michelle M.: He’s Irish, right? Of COURSE he’d look good in green.
………course, Craiggers looks good in anything…or, I presume, nothing as well.
HUGS…
hilarious!
LMAO! Too funny. Thanks for making me laugh. And it was brilliant!
Michelle M.: No he’s not. The porn ad is correct in identifying the men as hung. The ad was referring to the penis size, where ‘hung’ in that context is grammatically correct. Craig is the one who used the word to describe the act of hanging, so it’s Craig who is wrong. What’s new?!?!
::grumble grumble grumble::
Enrico – Craig could have changed it to “Gorgeous Hanged Men” but then he loses the integrity of the ad. It would be correct, but it wouldn’t be funny. I believe he took artistic license because it’s a joke.
And you shouldn’t correct Craig. He is our god. Blind faith, Snickerdoodle.
Hey great weblog, just pondering what spam software package you use for reviews due to the fact i get lots on my weblog. Can you please let me know here, so that not only I but other readers can put it on our websites too.