Movies

My Trip to The Planet of the Apes

August 30, 2011
By

So about a month ago (or a meager four blog posts ago) I posted how I thought the movie Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a bad idea. While most people agreed with me (as smart, good looking people tend to do) the Adams (otherwise known as the gruesome twosome) basically said I was the biggest fucking idiot they ever had the displeasure of reading, how I was wrong in every way possible, and that I have a small penis.

Anyway, the point of my post was to say that I thought the new movie (which I hadn’t seen at the time) changed what was originally a cautionary tale of man wiping themselves out and apes evolving to take their place, into a more Hollywood tale of humans creating supersmart apes that overthrow them. The gruesome twosome had a field day telling me how ignorant I was and insisted that I was an idiot for not taking the four sequels that came out after Planet of the Apes into consideration.

What they said is true. I didn’t take the four sequels into consideration before writing my post. At the time, I had only seen the original Planet of the Apes (and the Tim Burton remake, but the less said about that, that better) but I still stand by my post in regards to my hesitancy to accept the plot of Rise of the Planet of the Apes. I have since watched the four sequels and Rise of the Planet of the Apes and can now speak about each more thoroughly.

I’d just like to start off by saying that this series is amazing. I was totally blown away by the complexity of the series, and the incredible continuity from movie to movie. It was definitely a single story told over a series of movie in the same vein as Star Wars. Do I think they had the entire series planned out when they made the first movie? No. Just like I don’t think George Lucas always knew Anakin built C-3PO or J.K. Rowling knew about the Elder Wand or the Horcruxes. But what they were able to create (especially with the last three movies) was a really cool circular storyline that carried over from movie to movie astonishingly well.

Another thing that struck me about these movies are how freaking dark they are. You haven’t felt gloomy till you’ve seen the ending to Escape from Planet of the Apes. What started off as a fun The Voyage Home-y fish out of water story turned into BAM! BAM! DEATH! DIE! BAM! BAM! BANG! Mama…

But as I’ve said, these movies were fantastic. And now I can talk about how I was wrong (an extremely rare occurrence) in my previous post. Humans didn’t kill themselves off letting apes evolve to take their place over millions of years. The transition from human-dominated to ape-dominated in the original timeline of the first two movies is only a thousand years. The transition becomes even shorter when Cornelius and Zira go back in time and accelerate things by having their evolved child Caesar accelerate matters with his rebellion. And the nuclear war that annihilated humans wasn’t just regular good old fashioned human war, it was more about the humans attempt to stop the apes from taking over.

So there. I was wrong. I still think I have a valid point when just looking at the first movie, and the intentions of the filmmakers at that time, but I will concede that an ape rebellion against the humans was the intent of the original series, and I was wrong to think that Rise of the Planet of the Apes was lame for being about apes rebelling against humans and not humans wiping themselves out.

Now let’s talk about the new movie, Rise of the Planet of the Apes. It was really good. It tells the story of a scientist and his crusade to find a drug that cures Alzheimer’s. In the movie, he experiments on apes and the result is a super smart ape named Caesar who begins the ape rebellion. Overall the story was really good, and the special effects were amazing. I’d even say it even has similar themes to the original series. The original series was very reminiscent of the civil rights movement, while this new movie lost a bit of that and it came across more about animal rights. Not that that’s a bad thing, animal rights is a big issue, it just doesn’t have the same power as civil rights.

I still have some beef with the movie though. As a fan of the original series (yes, I only just saw them a week ago, but as a fanboy I reserve the right to have fanboy rage at the drop of a hat, and I’m reminded of this quote from the Family Guy Star Wars parody:

Chris (Luke Skywalker): You don’t believe in the Force, do you?
Peter (Han Solo): Oh, you mean the thing you just found out about three hours ago and are now judging me for not believing in?

) I can still be upset with this movie for what it does with the timeline. Wait a second, did I just open and close parentheses around a blockquote? Holy shit, my mind has just been blown. Okay, I’m back!

What the hell is this new movie? It’s a reboot, plain and simple. This isn’t a prequel that fits nicely into the framework set up by the original series. It completely contradicts what we know about the ape rebellion in the original series. And frankly, as a newbie fan of the original series, it’s kind of annoying. The Caesar of this movie, is not the Caesar of the original movies. The original movies also didn’t have supersmart gas that turned helped the apes rebel, which is something I’ve always found a bit cheap about the new movie. But like I said before, the new movie is really good. It just doesn’t fit in with the other movies, and it’s obvious that the filmmakers wanted to make a cool action movie and just gave it a Planet of the Apes title.

So in conclusion, the original Planet of the Apes movies are awesome, and I was wrong not to take the entire series into consideration when discussing my beef with the new movie. And yes, the new movie is pretty darn good, but I still stand by the fact that the science experiment gone wrong storyline isn’t as powerful as the intent and message of the first movie and the series that followed.

Oh, and my penis is just right, thank you very much.

Comment (16) on this Entry

Why Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a Bad Idea

July 18, 2011
By

I know Adam is all excited about the upcoming Rise of the Planet of the Apes, a prequel which explains how the apes came to power, but I think this is a bad idea that ruins what’s so great about the original movie and its themes. Plus Adam is an idiot, so therefore anything he likes is automatically deemed stupid.

At the end of the original movie, astronaut George Taylor stumbles upon the ruins of the Statue of Liberty and realizes that he was on Earth all along, and the apes are in control now. Now tell me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the whole point of that twist to show how humans wiped themselves off the face of the planet (mostly) and apes evolved to take their place? Isn’t the whole point of the movie to make us more aware of the consequences of our actions? That we blew up the Statue of Liberty and turned the Earth into a wasteland through (what I can only assume) nuclear war.

This idea is made even more poignant when you remember that in an earlier scene the ape Cornelius reads from the sacred scrolls:

“Beware the beast Man, for he is the Devil’s pawn. Alone among God’s primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother’s land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.”

See? We kill ourselves through war and greed and lust for power. Now Rise of the Planet of the Apes is trying to tell us that we made apes super-smart and they overthrow us. So what was a lesson in humanity has turned into Deep Blue Sea with apes. The fault is no longer with humanity, but instead a few scientists who made a really bad decision. Where is the lesson in that? Fear science? Is that the lesson we should be taking out of this?

I will reserve further judgement until I see the movie itself, but the trailers seem to make the plot very clear. We didn’t doom ourselves through war, a few scientists doomed us all through science.

Comment (41) on this Entry

First Look at Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen

Comment (9) on this Entry

Thor – Review

May 10, 2011
By


I saw Thor this past weekend. I don’t know much about the comic book character and the previews looked all over the place, so I wasn’t sure exactly what to expect. But I loved it. In fact, there was a scene in the movie early on where I thought to myself “Yes, I love this movie.” It was when our heroes, who live in a completely different world than our own are riding on horseback across a rainbow bridge to a portal to send them to another realm. It was a pure, unashamed, geeky explosion. And that’s all I kept thinking while I was watching. Thor was not afraid to be absolutely, positively geeky.

As much as I love the Batman and X-Men movies, they take their comic book sources and fit them into a grittier, realer world. Thor did no such thing. Yes, half the movie took place in our world, but they didn’t try to tone down the outrageous parts of the fantasy world to cram it into the real world. They let both worlds be themselves and blended them in a way that didn’t compromise either of them. Everything else about the movie was good too, the acting, directing, special effects, story, all that nonsense. But it’s unabashed geekiness is what really made me enjoy it.

Comment (20) on this Entry

Another Earth – Trailer

April 25, 2011
By

Hooray for low budget science fiction movies!

The car accident storyline could fall into cliché, but hopefully it doesn’t because otherwise this could totally be a great movie.

Comment (3) on this Entry

Source Code – Review

April 11, 2011
By

I saw Source Code this weekend. This is the second movie by Duncan Jones, who previous directed Moon, which I really liked. Source Code is about a man played by Jake Gyllenhaal who is sent to relive a train bombing over and over again until he is able to discover the bomber. It sounds a lot like Groundhog Day, and there’s certainly a similarity, but the movie is also a complex science fiction actioner that keeps you guessing (with the exception of a pretty obvious fake out early on) the entire time.

As my friend Michelle pointed out, it’s nice to have another movie like Inception that doesn’t just through splodey explosions on the screen in an attempt to distract the audience from the lack of plot (cough cough Battle: Los Angeles). Leaving this movie, opened up a whole string of discussion and theories that kept you wondering well after the credits rolled.

I also really appreciated the positive and optimistic message it left you with the end. A really warm freeze frame at the end was particularly welcome, especially given my Buffy the Vampire Slayer “the hardest thing in this world is to live in it” rut I’ve been in lately. Seriously, I’ve been so down on life and pessimistic lately, I don’t know wtf is wrong with me. I mean, there’s still a part of me that’s like “That optimism would never happen in real life!” But whatever, it’s nice to be a happy ray of sunshine for about 5 minutes.

But I digest! The movie was really great, and I highly recommend it if you’re looking for something to see.

Comment (28) on this Entry

Jennifer Lawrence Will Play Katniss Everdeen in The Hunger Games

Comment (6) on this Entry

The Adjustment Bureau – Review

March 14, 2011
By

So I saw The Adjustment Bureau over the weekend. The movie is based on the short story Adjustment Team by Philip K. Dick. Movies based on his amazing short stories are always very hit or miss. Hit being Minority Report, miss being Blade Runner. OMG I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT IT’S THE BEST MOVIE ON THE FACE OF THE PLANET YOU SHOULD DIE. Yeah, whatever, get it out of your system. Anyway, how was the movie?

I really enjoyed it. I wouldn’t tell you to run out and see it right away, but it’s definitely a renter. It really focused on the heart of the story which was the relationship between Matt Damon and Emily’s Blunt’s characters which is always more important than explaining every little detail or crazy action sequences. This was definitely made on a shoestring budget and it was nice to see the filmmakers have to focus on the smaller aspects rather than throwing random stuff on the screen and hoping it made sense. The actions scenes that they did have though, were extremely well choreographed with doors leading this way and that way and capable of taking you anywhere, which was a lot of fun to watch.

The story is about a congressman played by Matt Damon (at no point do they make his party affilliation clear, which I always appreciate in movies) falls in love with ballerina Emily Blunt. But the Adjustment Bureau, a team of men with special abilities, try to keep them apart because it’s not part of ‘the plan’. Like Inception, they just kinda drop you into this world where things are possible, and they don’t try to shove explanations down your throat. Some of the rules do seem made for the benefit of the movie, which takes you out of it a bit, but it’s only momentary and the movie keeps moving at a brisk enough pace that it doesn’t bother you for long.

So yeah, I’m not telling you to run out and see it, but if you’re looking for something to see, this should definitely be a viable option for you. At least rent it when it comes out on DVD or Netflix.

Comment (21) on this Entry

A Slight Peeve Directed at Natalie Portman

March 1, 2011
By

You know I’m glad she won the Oscar and all. You know I love her lots, and lots and lots and lots. And you know I enjoyed Black Swan, which she was phenomenal in. But during her acceptance speech she made a point to thank previous directors who hired her in stuff like Luc Besson, Mike Nichols, and Darren Aronofsky. But, um, what about George Lucas?! Why were you just singling out the artsy fartsy movie directors? Yes, Star Wars isn’t your finest work, and most of that can be blamed on the poor writing and direction of George Lucas, but he made you a household name! It’s not certain whether you’d be where you are now and have all the opportunities you have now without him catapulting your career! Don’t be one of those actors who resents the geeky role that made you famous! That is all.

Comment (32) on this Entry

Reasons Jean-Luc Picard is Cooler than Han Solo

February 24, 2011
By


Ever try to debate Star Wars versus Star Trek with someone? I have. And they inevitably bring up Han Solo. As if the relative coolness of one character is enough to redeem an entire mediocre franchise. Well I would like to prove once and for all that Star Trek is better than Star Wars by proving their Han Solo argument is all wrong by demonstrating how Jean-Luc Picard is ultimately cooler:

1. Jean-Luc Picard’s starship is bigger. A lot bigger.

2. If Jean-Luc Picard’s starship fails, it’s for reasons of political intrigue and/or intergalactic anomalies, not comic effect.

3. Jean-Luc Picard is so cool, he doesn’t even have to fly his own ship. He has bitches for that.

4. Forsooth! Jean-Luc Piccard is played by thine awesome Shakespearean trained actor.

5. Jean-Lud Picard’s sidekick doesn’t smell like a wookie.

6. Jean-Luc Picard has had multiple love interests over the years, including the ever present adoration of Dr. Beverly Crusher. Han had a coked up princess.

7. Jean-Luc Picard hates children, while Han plays with ewoks.

8. Jean-Luc Picard never got frozen in carbonite, and if he had, he never would have made that goofy face.

9. Jean-Luc Picard never got tied up by ewoks.

10. Jean-Luc Picard talks smack to Borg while Han gets shit from protocol droids.

11. You can tell Jean-Luc Picard the odds and he’ll still beat them.

12. “Make is so.” is a way cooler command than “Punch it.”

13. Han Solo and Will Schuester share the same love of vests.

14. Jean-Luc Picard only becomes scruffy looking after living a lifetime in an alternate universe created by an extinct civilization.

15. Han Solo is always prattling on about getting a money reward, while they don’t even have money in Picard’s more sophisticated civilization.

16. Han Solo shoots bounty hunters who catch him and threaten to turn him over to criminal overlords. Jean-Luc Picard just doesn’t get caught by bounty hunters.

17. Jean-Luc Picard doesn’t get betrayed by his best friends.

18. Jean-Luc Picard can make the Kessel Run in less than five parsecs. He also knows that a parsec is a unit of distance, not time.

19. What does “Millennium Falcon” even mean, anyway?

20. Jean-Luc Picard gets higher billing.

21. Not only does Jean-Luc Picard save civilization in his own time period, he goes back in time to save civilization in the past as well. Han Solo didn’t even try to save us from the prequels.

22. Jean-Luc Picard makes references to classic literature. Han Solo makes references to that one time he did something cool a long time ago.

23. Jean-Luc Picard doesn’t scream like a girl when he’s getting tortured. Han Solo would have said there were five lights.

24. Jean-Luc Picard was never the third wheel in an incestuous love triangle.

25. Jean-Luc Picard was taken prisoner by the Borg because he would be a great asset to their collective. Han Solo was taken prisoner by Jabba the Hutt because he did a crappy job at the task he was hired for.

See? Waaaay cooler. Have anything you’d like to add?

Comment (39) on this Entry

Search